Albuquerque, New Mexico Car Accidents Dog Bites Motorcycle Accidents Premises Liability Slip-and-Fall Truck Accidents Wrongful Death Anchorage, Alaska Personal Injury Lawyer Car Accidents Dog Bites Medical Malpractice Motorcycle Accidents Pedestrian Accidents Premises Liability Slip & Fall Injury Truck Accidents Workers’ Compensation Wrongful Death Appleton, Wisconsin Car Accidents Dog Bites Motorcycle Accidents Premises Liability Slip-and-Fall Truck Accidents Wrongful Death Austin, Texas Personal Injury Car Accidents Truck Accidents Motorcycle Accidents Pedestrian Accidents Rideshare Accidents Bus Accidents Dog Bites Premises Liability Wrongful Death Bakersfield, California Personal Injury Car Accidents Dog Bites Motorcycle Accidents Pedestrian Accidents Truck Accidents Wrongful Death Employment Lawyer Overtime Disputes Wage and Hour Disputes Workers’ Compensation Wrongful Termination Boise, Idaho Car Accidents Dog Bites Motorcycle Accidents Pedestrian Injury Premises Liability Slip-and-Fall Truck Accidents Wrongful Death Fargo, North Dakota Car Accidents Dog Bites Motorcycle Accidents Pedestrian Injury Premises Liability Slip-and-Fall Truck Accidents Wrongful Death Fresno, California Car Accidents Dog Bites Motorcycle Accidents Pedestrian Accidents Premises Liability Slip-and-Fall Truck Accidents Wrongful Death Employment Lawyer Unpaid Wages Workers’ Compensation Wrongful Termination Las Vegas, Nevada Car Accidents Dog Bites Motorcycle Accidents Premises Liability Slip-and-Fall Wrongful Death Los Angeles, California Car Accidents Dog Bites Motorcycle Accidents Pedestrian Accidents Premises Liability Slip-and-Fall Truck Accidents Wrongful Death New York City, New York Car Accidents Dog Bites Motorcycle Accidents Pedestrian Accidents Premises Liability Slip-and-Fall Truck Accidents Wrongful Death Plantation, Florida Car Accidents Dog Bites Motorcycle Accidents Pedestrian Accidents Slip-and-Fall Truck Accidents Wrongful Death Portland, Maine Car Accidents Motorcycle Accidents Premises Liability Slip-and-Fall Truck Accidents Wrongful Death Portland, Oregon Bicycle Accidents Car Accidents Dog Bites Motorcycle Accidents Pedestrian Accident Premises Liability Slip-and-Fall Truck Accidents Wrongful Death
Contact
Call (888) 352-9243
Call Now Chat With Us
Personal Injury Attorneys

Dog Bite Lawyer in San Antonio

32+Years Experience
20,000+Cases Handled
98%Success Rate
Dog Bite Lawyer in San Antonio
AVVO 10.0 Superb
A+ BBB Accredited
Super Lawyers Selected
Distinguished
NATIONAL TRIAL LAWYERS Top 100
Multi-Million Dollar Advocates Forum Member

Injured in a Dog Attack in San Antonio?

Texas has no dog-bite statute, which surprises almost everyone who has just been attacked. There is no law that automatically makes an owner pay the moment a dog breaks skin. Instead, your claim rises or falls on an old common-law rule and on proof of the owner’s carelessness, and knowing which one fits your case is where a real recovery begins.

A capable San Antonio dog bite lawyer builds the case around what the owner knew and what the owner failed to do. San Antonio carries one of the larger stray populations in the state, and San Antonio Animal Care Services logs bite reports from neighborhoods across the South Side, the West Side, and the rest of the city every week.

That local history often matters, because a dog with prior complaints is a dog whose owner was already on notice.

Call (512) 254-4424 for a free consultation, available 24/7. You pay nothing unless we win.

Our San Antonio Dog Bite Lawyer

Matthew Kotzen
Reviewed by
Personal Injury Attorney • Member, State Bar of Texas
Top 100 Civil Plaintiff Attorneys Best Attorneys of America

A former insurance-defense trial attorney, Matthew Kotzen spent the early part of his career representing insurance companies before switching sides to fight for injured people. He earned his J.D. from the Walter F. George School of Law at Mercer University and has represented thousands of injury victims.

“Texas doesn't hold an owner responsible just because their dog bit you. It holds them responsible for what they knew. That distinction is the whole case.”— Matthew Kotzen
Free Case Review →

He is a Lifetime Member of Best Attorneys of America, was named to the Top 100 Civil Plaintiff Attorneys by The National Trial Lawyers, and is admitted to the State Bar of Texas.

“I spent years building cases for insurance companies. Now I use that same playbook to make sure they pay what they actually owe.”

Read Matthew Kotzen’s full profile →

Goldberg & Loren Fights for Maximum Compensation

Martindale-Hubbell Distinguished 2025Martindale-Hubbell Client Champion Gold 2025

Pay Nothing, Unless We Win

Texas Injury Law at a Glance

Deadline to file a lawsuitTwo years from the date of the injury. Tex. Civ. Prac. & Rem. Code § 16.003
Fault ruleModified comparative responsibility ("51% bar"): you recover only if you are 50% or less at fault, and your award is reduced by your share. §§ 33.001, 33.012
Dog owner liabilityStrict liability if the owner knew the dog was dangerous; otherwise negligence, including violation of a local leash ordinance. Marshall v. Ranne, 511 S.W.2d 255 (Tex. 1974)

How the Texas One Bite Rule Shapes a San Antonio Dog Bite Claim

The so-called one bite rule comes from Texas common law, and it means an owner can be held liable when they knew or should have known their dog was dangerous. That knowledge often comes from a prior bite, but the name misleads, because owners are not automatically excused for a first bite.

A dog that lunged at a mail carrier, snapped at a child, or growled through a fence can show the owner already understood the risk before anyone was hurt.

The second path is ordinary negligence, and Goldberg & Loren pursues both. An owner who broke a leash law or left a gate open can be liable even for a dog with no bite history, because the carelessness itself caused the attack.

Running both theories at once gives a claim two independent ways to reach the same result, so a weakness in one does not sink the case.

Proving the Owner Knew the Dog Was Dangerous

Establishing the owner’s knowledge sits at the heart of a one-bite case. Prior complaints to Animal Care Services, warnings passed between neighbors, a heavy chain and muzzle kept by the door, or a pattern of aggressive behavior all point to an owner who understood what the animal could do.

Neighbors are often the key, because they remember the dog everyone on the street already avoided.

That evidence has to be gathered before memories fade. A quick canvass of the block, a statement from the letter carrier who services the route, and a pull of the animal-control file can turn a he-said dispute into a documented history of a dangerous animal.

Veterinary records sometimes help too, since a vet who muzzled the dog for every visit created a note about temperament the owner cannot easily deny later.

San Antonio also maintains a formal process for declaring an animal dangerous after a qualifying incident, and a dog already carrying that label leaves little room for an owner to claim surprise.

When Animal Care Services has issued a citation or logged a prior bite, that record does much of the work of showing the owner was on notice before your injury.

Negligence and San Antonio Leash Law Violations

San Antonio requires dogs to be restrained, and a loose dog is a violation of the city ordinance enforced by San Antonio Animal Care Services. When an unrestrained dog attacks, that violation becomes strong evidence of negligence regardless of the dog’s history.

An owner who let a dog roam has already broken the rule written to prevent exactly this harm.

Loose dogs are a familiar problem across San Antonio. An owner who ignored a failing fence, clipped a worn tie-out, or opened a front door with an unrestrained dog inside gave the animal its chance to reach a victim, and that lapse is the negligence a claim is built on.

Negligence Per Se When an Ordinance Is Broken

When an owner breaks a safety ordinance like the leash law and that violation causes the injury, Texas may treat the conduct as negligence per se.

The doctrine can shortcut part of the proof, because the broken ordinance itself helps establish that the owner fell below the standard of care, turning a city code violation into a building block for your claim rather than a side note.

The rule is not automatic: the injured person still has to fall within the class the ordinance was meant to protect and show the violation actually caused the harm. A pedestrian bitten by an unleashed dog fits squarely inside the leash ordinance’s purpose, which is why these facts tend to line up well for the victim.

What to Do in the First Hours After a Dog Attack

The steps you take right after a dog attack protect both your health and your claim. Rabies risk and infection make prompt medical care the first priority, and identifying the dog and its owner early keeps the case from stalling when it is time to find the insurance that pays. After a dog attack in San Antonio, focus on these steps:

  • Get medical care immediately, both for infection risk and for the record
  • Identify the owner and get their contact and any vaccination information
  • Report the bite to San Antonio Animal Care Services so it is documented
  • Photograph your injuries, the dog, and the location if you can
  • Collect names and numbers from anyone who saw the attack

That report to Animal Care Services matters more than people expect. It creates an official record of the attack and can reveal whether the same dog has generated prior complaints, which is frequently the evidence that establishes the owner already knew the animal was dangerous.

It also starts the rabies observation process, which answers the vaccination question on the record.

Infection and Medical Risks a Dog Bite Leaves Behind

A dog bite is rarely just a surface wound. The real danger is often below the skin, where puncture wounds from a dog’s teeth drive bacteria deep into tissue and close over a small opening that looks minor from the outside, so a bite that barely bleeds can still cause a serious infection.

That is why emergency clinicians treat even modest-looking punctures seriously.

Dog mouths carry bacteria such as Pasteurella and Capnocytophaga, and both can produce fast-moving infections that turn a manageable wound into a hospital stay. The National Library of Medicine warns that animal bites can become infected and cause serious medical problems, and the deeper the puncture, the harder that infection is to reach.

Rabies is far rarer but far more serious, so an unvaccinated or unidentified dog can send a victim through a course of post-exposure shots, and tetanus is another reason clinicians ask when you last had a booster.

The wound cultures, imaging, and infection notes that protect your health also create the timeline an insurer cannot easily dispute, tying the treatment and its cost directly to the attack.

Whose Insurance Pays After a Bexar County Dog Attack

The dog’s owner is responsible, but the money almost always comes from an insurance policy rather than the owner’s own bank account. Homeowner and renter policies commonly cover dog bites, which is why identifying the right policy is a practical first move, and in some situations a second party, such as a landlord, can share the responsibility.

Finding every available policy is what turns a valid claim into a paid one. Dog bite injuries rank among the costlier liability claims insurers handle, and they defend them accordingly, so knowing where the coverage sits shapes the approach from the first demand letter forward.

Homeowner and Renter Insurance Coverage

Most dog bite recoveries come from the owner’s homeowner or renter insurance, which typically includes personal liability coverage for injuries someone in the household causes.

The claim is filed against the policy, not a demand that a neighbor empty their savings, which often makes people more willing to pursue the compensation they need, especially when the parties know each other or share a fence line.

Two features deserve early attention: many policies include a small medical payments provision that can cover immediate treatment regardless of fault, while others carry breed exclusions or a cap on animal-related payouts, so confirming the limits and exclusions at the outset tells you whether one policy will be enough or whether other parties share responsibility.

When a Landlord Can Be Held Liable

A landlord is not automatically responsible for a tenant’s dog, but can be held liable when the landlord knew a dangerous dog lived on the property and did nothing about it. If a property manager received complaints about an aggressive animal and let it stay, that inaction can open a separate claim against the landlord’s own coverage.

The question usually comes down to knowledge and control. Courts look at whether the landlord actually knew the specific dog was dangerous, not merely that a dog lived there, and whether the landlord had the power to act, such as enforcing a lease term or refusing to renew.

Attacks in shared spaces the landlord controls, like a common courtyard or a walkway between units, tend to strengthen that link, and uncovering what the landlord knew, and when, can widen the path to recovery beyond the tenant alone, which matters most when the tenant carries no insurance.

Why Children Suffer the Worst Dog Bite Injuries

Children are bitten more often than adults, and because they are small, the wounds land on the face, head, and neck instead of the arms and legs. A child’s dog bite case carries heightened medical and emotional stakes, along with the lifelong impact of visible scarring in the places hardest to hide.

The stakes reach well beyond the initial hospital visit: a young child may face years of follow-up care and a lasting fear of dogs that surfaces at every neighbor’s yard and every park. A claim has to account for all of it rather than the first round of stitches.

Scarring, Disfigurement, and Reconstructive Care

Severe bites frequently leave permanent damage that reaches far below the initial wound, so the claim should account for the full arc of treatment, which often includes reconstructive surgery and years of follow-up care.

Serious dog bite injuries commonly involve deep puncture wounds, torn tissue, permanent scarring, nerve damage, and lasting emotional trauma. Scars on a growing child add another layer: a repair that looks complete at age six may need revision as the child grows, so surgeons often stage procedures across several years.

Valuing that future care, and the emotional harm alongside it, is essential to a settlement that covers the victim’s needs rather than the visible damage on the day the claim is filed.

Putting a Number on a San Antonio Dog Bite Claim

There is no set price for a dog bite claim. Value depends on the severity of the injury, whether surgery or scarring is involved, the age of the victim, and the insurance available to pay, so a deep facial wound to a child carries a very different value than a single puncture that heals cleanly in a week.

Emotional harm counts too, especially for children left with a lasting fear of dogs. Accepting an insurer’s first number, before a doctor can speak to the permanence of a scar or the chance of another surgery, is how these claims get undervalued.

What Compensation Covers in a Dog Bite Case

Compensation in a dog bite claim falls into two broad groups. Economic damages cover the costs with a receipt behind them, including emergency treatment, reconstructive surgery, physical therapy, medication, and wages a parent loses while caring for an injured child.

Future medical care belongs here too, which is why a claim filed before treatment ends should build in the cost of what still lies ahead.

Non-economic damages cover the harm that has no invoice.

Pain, the fear that follows a violent attack, the embarrassment of a permanent scar, and the loss of normal daily enjoyment all carry value even though no bill lists them, and for a child bitten in the face these often outweigh the medical costs, because the injury affects them for decades after the wound closes.

The Two-Year Deadline on a Texas Dog Bite Claim

Texas gives dog bite victims two years from the date of the injury to file a personal injury lawsuit. Miss that deadline and the court will almost certainly dismiss the case, no matter how strong the evidence of the owner’s knowledge or the leash violation.

The two-year deadline is the strictest rule in a claim that otherwise runs on flexible common-law tests.

Waiting until the deadline nears works against you long before it arrives. Witnesses move away from the block, the animal-control file grows harder to reconstruct, and the dog’s history becomes harder to establish with time.

Starting early lets a lawyer canvass neighbors while the attack is fresh, preserve the Animal Care Services record, and photograph a scar through its stages of healing.

The deadline works differently for children: when the victim is a minor, Texas generally pauses the two-year period until the child turns eighteen, so a family is not forced to rush a claim while a young child is still in treatment. Even then, waiting rarely helps, because the evidence that proves an owner knew about a dangerous dog does not keep.

Bexar County Dog Bite Attorneys

Because Texas has no dog-bite statute, these claims turn on proof of what the owner knew and did, and on finding the policy that pays.

A San Antonio dog bite lawyer handles both, tracing the animal’s history through Animal Care Services and the coverage through the right homeowner or renter policy, so you can focus on healing while your claim moves forward. Our team brings decades of experience to injury claims across Texas, with no fee unless we win, and the line is open at any hour.

Call (512) 254-4424 today, or reach us through our contact page to start your free case review and learn what your dog bite claim could be worth.

Frequently Asked Questions

Whose policy actually pays

Texas has no dog-bite statute, so these claims run on common law from Marshall v. Ranne. An owner is liable when they knew or should have known the dog was dangerous, and the name misleads, because a first bite is not free. In fiscal 2025, San Antonio Animal Care Services handled 523 dangerous dog cases, up from 301 the year before, and every one of those files puts an owner on notice.

Two things: what the owner knew, and what the owner failed to do. Animal Care Services logged 3,810 bite and scratch cases in fiscal 2025, up from 3,090 a year earlier, and that file is often the strongest evidence in the case. Add statements from neighbors and the letter carrier, vet records showing a muzzle at every visit, and a leash ordinance violation carries the rest.

The owner is responsible, but the money almost always comes from a homeowner or renter policy rather than a neighbor's savings. In 2024, those insurers paid $1.57 billion across 22,658 dog-related injury claims, according to the Insurance Information Institute. Check the limits early, because some policies pay medical costs regardless of fault while others carry breed exclusions. A landlord who knew can open a second policy.

There is no set price, but the claim data shows what these cases actually pay. Texas recorded 1,040 dog bite claims in 2023 at an average of $59,925, and the national average reached $69,272 in 2024 (Insurance Information Institute). Your number turns on the severity of the wound, whether surgery or permanent scarring is involved, and the age of the victim. A facial wound to a child sits far above those averages.

Nothing up front. We work on contingency, so the consultation is free and you pay no attorney's fee unless we win. Insurers are defending these claims harder as volume climbs, with dog-related injury claims up nearly 19% in 2024 and 48% over the past decade (Insurance Information Institute). Texas also gives you just two years to file (Tex. Civ. Prac. & Rem. Code § 16.003), and that clock generally pauses for a child until eighteen.

The Texas laws described on this page are cited to the official statutes published by the Texas Legislature and were last reviewed on August 15, 2026.

Goldberg & Loren

211 Ranch Rd 620 S, Suite #230
Lakeway, TX 78734
(512) 254-4424
Our Office Location
Serving San Antonio & Bexar County
George Goldberg, founding partner of Goldberg & Loren

George Goldberg

Founding Partner • J.D. Magna Cum Laude, University of Miami

“I started on the defense side. I know every trick they use. Now I use that knowledge to fight for people who need it most.”

With over 32 years of trial experience and more than 20,000+ cases handled, George began his career in 1994 defending airlines and corporations—giving him rare insight into how the other side operates. Since 1996, he’s used that insider knowledge exclusively for plaintiffs, building Goldberg & Loren into a firm with a 98% success rate.

32+
Years
20K+
Cases
98%
Success
$550M+
Awarded
On This Page
4.9 on Google
Avvo 10.0 Superb
Super Lawyers Selected
AV Preeminent Rated
$550M+ Recovered
20,000+ Cases Won
Link copied