Contact
Call (888) 352-9243
Call Now Chat With Us
Personal Injury Attorneys

Attorneys for Dog Bite Victims in Dallas

32+Years Experience
20,000+Cases Handled
98%Success Rate
Attorneys for Dog Bite Victims in Dallas
AVVO 10.0 Superb
A+ BBB Accredited
Super Lawyers Selected
Distinguished
NATIONAL TRIAL LAWYERS Top 100
Multi-Million Dollar Advocates Forum Member

Bitten by a Dog in Dallas?

Most bite victims in Dallas never pick up the phone, and not because they doubt the owner should pay. They hesitate because they believe the owner personally would pay, and nobody wants to take rent money from a neighbor, a cousin, or the friend who hosted the neighborhood barbecue last weekend.

A Dallas dog bite lawyer spends the first ten minutes of most calls correcting that belief. In nearly every claim, the money comes from an insurance policy, not from a person’s savings account.

Homeowner’s and renter’s policies in Texas carry personal liability coverage, and dog attacks are one of the situations that coverage exists to handle. The owner does not get to choose whether to be generous.

Their insurer assigns an adjuster who starts building reasons to pay you less than the claim is worth, and that adjuster has done this many times before. If the dog belongs to someone you know, call (512) 254-4424 and get direct answers about the policy, the proof, and what your injuries are worth before you decide anything.

Our Dallas Dog Bite Lawyer

Matthew Kotzen
Reviewed by
Personal Injury Attorney • Member, State Bar of Texas
Top 100 Civil Plaintiff Attorneys Best Attorneys of America

A former insurance-defense trial attorney, Matthew Kotzen spent the early part of his career representing insurance companies before switching sides to fight for injured people. He earned his J.D. from the Walter F. George School of Law at Mercer University and has represented thousands of injury victims.

“A child's scar on day one is not the same scar at age fifteen. My job is to make sure a Dallas dog bite claim pays for the last surgery, not just the first one.”— Matthew Kotzen
Free Case Review →

He is a Lifetime Member of Best Attorneys of America, was named to the Top 100 Civil Plaintiff Attorneys by The National Trial Lawyers, and is admitted to the State Bar of Texas.

“I spent years building cases for insurance companies. Now I use that same playbook to make sure they pay what they actually owe.”

Read Matthew Kotzen’s full profile →

Goldberg & Loren Fights for Maximum Compensation

Martindale-Hubbell Distinguished 2025Martindale-Hubbell Client Champion Gold 2025

Pay Nothing, Unless We Win

Texas Injury Law at a Glance

Deadline to file a lawsuitTwo years from the date of the injury. Tex. Civ. Prac. & Rem. Code § 16.003
Fault ruleModified comparative responsibility ("51% bar"): you recover only if you are 50% or less at fault, and your award is reduced by your share. §§ 33.001, 33.012
Dog owner liabilityStrict liability if the owner knew the dog was dangerous; otherwise negligence, including violation of a local leash ordinance. Marshall v. Ranne, 511 S.W.2d 255 (Tex. 1974)

Who Actually Writes the Check

Start with a document nobody reads until they need it. A standard Texas homeowner’s policy includes personal liability coverage that follows the policyholder’s dog wherever the dog goes, at a park off Lower Greenville, on a sidewalk in Bishop Arts, or in your own front yard when the neighbor’s gate swings open.

Renter’s policies carry the same protection, which matters in apartment-heavy neighborhoods like Uptown and Oak Lawn where plenty of large dogs live inside apartments with no backyard at all.

The dog bite attorneys at Goldberg & Loren open every case by identifying that policy, because the policy sets the strategy. The demand letter goes to a claims office, not to your neighbor’s kitchen table, and negotiations happen with a licensed adjuster whose job is estimating what a Dallas County jury might award you.

Your relationship with the owner survives most claims because the owner is not the one writing the check.

Homeowner’s and Renter’s Policies Cover More Attacks Than People Think

Coverage follows the owner, not the address. A bite outside a Deep Ellum coffee shop or on a Garland cul-de-sac can still trigger the owner’s home policy even though the attack happened miles from the insured house, and if a visiting relative’s dog bites you inside your own home, that relative’s policy can still respond.

Victims routinely walk away from strong claims because the attack happened somewhere that seemed unconnected to anyone’s insurance.

The coverage also reaches injuries that involve no bite at all. A seventy-pound dog that bolts across a Mesquite driveway and knocks a grandmother off a porch step has caused a liability claim, and the broken hip from that fall often costs more than a puncture wound.

Cyclists chased into traffic and joggers pulled down by a lunging dog all fit inside the same coverage analysis.

Why Suing the Neighbor Rarely Means Taking the Neighbor’s House

Even when a lawsuit becomes necessary, the owner’s insurer hires the defense lawyers and pays any settlement or judgment up to the policy limits. Most dog bite claims resolve through negotiation inside those limits, so the owner’s out-of-pocket exposure usually begins and ends with a premium increase.

No savings account gets drained, and no house changes hands. The claim asks coverage the owner already paid for to do the job it was sold to do.

What Texas Dog Bite Claims Paid Out Last Year

Insurers publish what these claims cost them. The most recent dog bite liability data from the Insurance Information Institute puts the average paid claim nationwide at $65,450. Texas ranked sixth among all states with 1,313 paid claims, and the Texas average ran above the national figure at $70,885 per claim.

Those are averages, not ceilings.

Price out one serious forearm bite: emergency room wound closure might bill $6,000, an infection requiring two nights of IV antibiotics can add $20,000 more, and a hand specialist, twelve physical therapy sessions, and eight missed weeks at $1,100 per week push the claim past that $70,885 average before anyone has valued the scarring or a single sleepless night.

What the Texas One Bite Rule Makes Us Prove

Texas has no civil dog bite statute. The Legislature never passed one, so the liability rules come from court decisions, and those decisions built two separate paths for holding an owner responsible. Lawyers call Texas a one-bite state, and dog owners love to hear it as a free pass for a first attack, but the name misleads.

A prior bite is one way to prove an owner knew the dog was dangerous. It has never been the only way, and owners of dogs with spotless histories still lose negligence cases in Dallas County courtrooms.

Strict Liability When the Owner Knew the Dog Was Dangerous

The controlling rule comes from Marshall v. Ranne, a 1974 Texas Supreme Court decision that still governs animal attack claims. When an owner knew or should have known an animal was dangerous, Texas holds that the owner is strictly liable for every injury from the attack.

Once you prove knowledge, the height of the fence, the strength of the leash, and the owner’s good intentions all stop mattering.

Knowledge takes more forms than a prior bite: a documented habit of snapping at children, lunging at delivery drivers, or fighting other dogs can prove it, a warning from an animal control officer counts, and neighbors who quietly kept their kids away from one particular yard make persuasive witnesses.

Negligence Claims When There Is No Bite History

When the dog’s past is clean or unknowable, the case shifts to what the owner did on the day of the attack. Texas negligence law asks whether the owner used reasonable care in handling or restraining the animal, and everyday choices answer that question.

Handing a ninety-pound dog’s leash to a nine-year-old on a crowded sidewalk fails the test, and so does propping a gate open during a backyard party or letting a dog roam an Irving cul-de-sac because it never bit anyone before.

These cases turn on scene details, where the owner stood, what restraint the dog wore, and how long it had been loose, so write down everything you remember the same day, because those specifics blur faster than most people expect.

Leash Ordinances and Fence Failures as Proof

Dallas city code requires owners to keep their dogs restrained when off the owner’s property. A dog that reaches you loose on a public street usually puts its owner in violation, and jurors treat an ordinance violation as strong evidence of carelessness. The physical evidence deserves the same urgency.

Photograph the leaning fence post, the gap under the chain link, or the gate latch held shut with a bungee cord before the owner repairs it, because that repair tends to happen within days of an attack.

Prior Complaints to 311 and Animal Services as Evidence

Dallas 311 takes animal complaints, and Dallas Animal Services keeps records on loose dog reports, bite investigations, and quarantines. A records request can surface a complaint about the same dog from months before your attack, which is why our firm sends those requests during the first week of a case.

One documented complaint can convert an ordinary negligence claim into a strict liability one that is far harder for the owner to defend.

When the Bite Victim Is a Child

A young child stands at a dog’s eye level. That single fact explains why adults tend to take bites on hands and forearms while children take wounds to the face, the scalp, and the neck. It also explains why child cases involve different medical timelines, harder valuation questions, and a layer of court oversight that adult claims never see.

A five-year-old at a birthday cookout in Oak Cliff who leans in to hug the host’s dog can end the evening in an emergency room, and the claim that follows has to serve that child at five, at twelve, and at eighteen, which demands more planning and far more patience with the medical process than a standard adult case.

Facial Wounds, Scar Revision, and Surgeries Timed to Growth

The first repair happens within hours of the attack; the last one may wait a decade.

Plastic surgeons often stage scar revision around a child’s growth because scar tissue does not stretch the way healthy skin does, and a repair that looks clean at six can pull and distort by sixteen, so families regularly face a second or third procedure scheduled years after the insurance company hoped to close the file.

That timeline shapes every demand our team writes for a child client. Settling for the first hospital bill hands the family the cost of every future procedure, so a properly built demand prices the surgeries that have not happened yet and backs each number with a treating surgeon’s written plan.

How Texas Courts Approve Settlements for Minors

A parent cannot simply sign away a child’s claim in Texas. A judge must review and approve a minor’s settlement, usually through a short proceeding lawyers call a friendly suit, and in Dallas County those hearings typically happen at the George L. Allen Sr. Courts Building downtown.

The judge often appoints a guardian ad litem, an independent attorney whose only assignment is confirming the deal actually serves the child.

The court also controls where the money sits. Judges commonly direct settlement funds into the court registry or into a structured arrangement that begins paying out when the child turns eighteen, keeping the recovery intact until the child is old enough to use it.

Damages and Deadlines on Every Bite Claim

Adjusters prefer dog attack claims that stay small and slow: small means the victim counts only the first emergency bill and forgets everything that follows, and slow means the two-year filing window runs out while treatment drags on.

Your claim beats both tactics when you count every category of loss early and put the filing deadline on a calendar during the first month. Serious attacks also run on two legal tracks at once, a civil claim that compensates you and a separate criminal statute that can put a reckless owner in prison, and neither track does the other’s job.

Medical Care, Rabies Protocols, and Counseling After an Attack

Report the bite to Dallas Animal Services even when you know the dog. The report creates an official record for your claim, and it lets the agency confirm the animal’s rabies vaccination status, which tells your doctors whether you need preventive treatment.

Skipping that step leaves a medical question open and hands the adjuster a missing document to argue about later.

Recoverable damages reach well past that first emergency visit. Texas law lets a bite victim claim every category below when the medical records and pay stubs support it.

  • Emergency treatment, wound repair, and infection care in the weeks after the attack
  • Scar revision and reconstructive surgery, including procedures scheduled years out
  • Counseling for nightmares, fear of dogs, and diagnosed post-traumatic stress
  • Wages lost during recovery and reduced earning power when injuries linger
  • Physical pain and permanent disfigurement, valued separately from any bill

The last two categories demand deliberate proof. Photograph the wounds on a schedule as they heal, because a scar reads differently at week one and at month six. Keep a short daily note about missed shifts, canceled plans, and the days a barking dog makes you cross the street.

Jurors trust records made in real time far more than memories reconstructed two years after the dog attack.

Lillian’s Law and When an Attack Becomes a Felony

Picture a dog that shoves through a sagging fence panel on a residential street near Fair Park and attacks a man walking to the bus stop. If the owner knew the fence was failing and left it alone, prosecutors can bring a felony charge under Section 822.005 of the Texas Health and Safety Code, the statute Texans know as Lillian’s Law.

It applies when an owner, acting with criminal negligence, fails to secure a dog that then attacks someone off the owner’s property and causes serious bodily injury or death.

That prosecution belongs to the State of Texas, not to you. A conviction can send the owner to prison and still pay none of your medical bills, while your civil claim pays damages and sends nobody to jail. The two cases run separately, though the criminal file often feeds the civil one with police reports, witness statements, and photographs.

The Two-Year Clock on Texas Dog Bite Lawsuits

Texas gives you two years from the date of the attack to file a personal injury lawsuit under Section 16.003 of the Civil Practice and Remedies Code. File late and the strength of your evidence stops mattering, because the court dismisses the case on the calendar alone.

Claims belonging to injured children can get additional time, but treating that extension as a plan costs families evidence they can never get back.

Evidence in dog attack cases fades quickly. Doorbell and porch camera footage overwrites itself within weeks, witnesses move across DFW and stop answering unfamiliar numbers, and the 311 complaint that proves the owner knew becomes harder to tie to a dog nobody has seen in a year. Two years is the legal limit; the practical one is far shorter.

Get Answers From a Dallas Dog Bite Lawyer

The next step is applying this to your attack, your policy, and your medical timeline, and that takes one conversation, not more reading. Our firm offers a free consultation where a Dallas dog bite lawyer reviews what happened, answers the insurance question honestly, and tells you whether the claim is worth pursuing.

Call (512) 254-4424 and bring your questions. Ask what the owner’s policy likely covers, whether the dog’s history supports strict liability, and how future treatment fits into the demand. Prefer to start in writing?

Send the basics of what happened, including when and where the attack occurred, through the firm’s contact page, and a member of the team will follow up.

Frequently Asked Questions

Yes, in the more serious cases. An owner commits a felony when criminal negligence in securing the dog leads to an unprovoked attack off the property causing serious bodily injury. The same applies when the owner already knew the dog was dangerous and it attacked outside a secure enclosure (Tex. Health & Safety Code § 822.005).

It is a third degree felony, or second degree if someone dies. That case runs separately from yours.

It can be argued, but it rarely ends a case. Texas reduces your recovery by your share of the fault and bars it only above 50 percent (Tex. Civ. Prac. & Rem. Code §§ 33.001, 33.012). Expect the insurer to say you provoked the animal. What usually answers that is the setting: a dog loose on a sidewalk, a gate left open, or a warning the owner ignored.

Often nobody, until the claim resolves. A hospital that admitted you within 72 hours of the attack can attach a lien to your claim instead of billing you directly (Tex. Prop. Code § 55.002). The law caps that lien at half of everything you collect (§ 55.004). Negotiating those liens down before the file closes is part of the work.

The Texas laws described on this page are cited to the official statutes published by the Texas Legislature and were last reviewed on August 15, 2026.

Goldberg & Loren

211 Ranch Rd 620 S, Suite #230
Lakeway, TX 78734
(512) 254-4424
Our Office Location
Serving Dallas & Dallas County

We Represent Those Injured in Car Accidents in the Following Cities and Communities in Texas.

  • Austin, TX
  • Dallas, TX
  • El Paso, TX
  • Fort Worth, TX
  • Houston, TX
  • Lakeway, TX
  • Midland-Odessa, TX
  • San Antonio, TX

Have Questions About Your Car Accident Case? Call Us Today:

George Goldberg, founding partner of Goldberg & Loren

George Goldberg

Founding Partner • J.D. Magna Cum Laude, University of Miami

“I started on the defense side. I know every trick they use. Now I use that knowledge to fight for people who need it most.”

With over 32 years of trial experience and more than 20,000+ cases handled, George began his career in 1994 defending airlines and corporations—giving him rare insight into how the other side operates. Since 1996, he’s used that insider knowledge exclusively for plaintiffs, building Goldberg & Loren into a firm with a 98% success rate.

32+
Years
20K+
Cases
98%
Success
$550M+
Awarded
On This Page
4.9 on Google
Avvo 10.0 Superb
Super Lawyers Selected
AV Preeminent Rated
$550M+ Recovered
20,000+ Cases Won
Link copied